ArticleBMC medical education2025
"A pilot study of MAP - a program for handling of aggressive behaviour in psychiatric wards. An evaluation of mediating mechanisms".
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-Escalation in United Kingdom Inpatient Mental Health Care: A Structured Critical Narrative Synthesis of People, Capability and Context.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Review
- Maximising relational capabilities and minimising restrictive practices in acute mental health units: the Safe Steps for De-escalation evaluation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStaff working at inpatient psychiatric hospitals are at greater risk of being exposed to workplace aggression, with an incidence rate over 32% worldwide. Workplace aggression includes behaviours or actions that are meant to inflict harm or injury, verbally or physically, to another person. Exposure to aggressive behaviour is associated with negative work-related outcomes and higher levels of coercive measures in mental health care facilities. Several interventions aimed to prevent or reduce workplace violence have been developed, and staff training programs have shown to have some efficacy towards increasing staff knowledge and competence, in addition to reduce coercion to patients. "Management of Aggression Program (MAP)" is a Norwegian, nationally employed staff training program designed after classic triage from green to red, and is categorized as primary-, secondary- and tertiary prevention, with the aim to providing staff basic understanding of aggression, risk assessment, violence prevention, preventive communication, de-escalation, teamwork and self-regulation. This pilot study aims to explore the possible mediating mechanisms of MAP.
methodsA qualitative exploratory study design was used. Data was collected by repeated semi-structured interviews of four participants at two different timepoints, using thematic analysis to analyse the written transcripts. FINDINGS AND
conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that themes within domain of cognitive reframing and contextualization might be the most important mediating mechanisms of the staff training program. The interviewed participants found the training program to be engaging, and the training provided the participants with knowledge and skills to be confident and conscious of their work. There is a lack of prior research or published studies about MAP, and similar programs, as of writing this report. Therefore, a need for further research on this topic is necessary. The findings of this study might be suitable for selection and operationalization of endpoints in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.