Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on maternal and fetal outcomes following elective cesarean section: an observational trial.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ERAS Protocol on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Following Elective Cesarean Section: a Controlled Trial
The Effect of the Cesarean ERAS Protocol on Mother-Infant and Father-Infant Bonding: a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breastfeeding Outcomes After Scheduled Cesarean Section Under an ERAS Pathway: An Analytical Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Impact on patient outcomes.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Cesarean Deliveries: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to investigate the maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean section (CS) receiving either standard care or enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.
methodsAfter approval of ethics committee (Gazi University Protocol Record Decision no: 502/31.05.2021) and registry to clinical trials (NCT06753058, Date 12/30/2024) 450 ASA II-III parturients at ≥ 18 years of age scheduled for elective CS under spinal anesthesia using bupivacaine plus opioids were included (n = 150, ERAS group and n = 300, control group). The ERAS protocol included restricting the fasting period before and after the surgery, administering oral nonparticulate carbohydrate solution (25 g of maltodextrin) 2 h (h) before surgery, intraoperative multimodal analgesia under spinal anesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis with intravenous (IV) 10 mg metoclopramide + 1.5 mg granisetron; postoperative analgesia was provided with IV nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug + paracetamol. While mother-baby contact was provided for both groups, all babies in the ERAS group were encouraged to breastfeed as soon as they were born. Maternal fasting duration, flatus, mobilization, urinary catheter removal times, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), rescue analgesic requirement, incidence of postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV), length of stay (LOS), complications, Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score 11 (ObsQoR-11T), were recorded in both groups. Newborn demographics, APGAR scores, umbilical cord blood gas analysis, nutritional and breastfeeding status and complications were also recorded.
resultsIn the ERAS group the ObsQoR-11T scores were better than the control group (p < 0.001). Maternal preoperative and postoperative fasting duration, postoperative first flatus and mobilization times and LOS, postoperative VAS, rescue analgesic requirement in the ERAS group were shorter than the control (p < 0.001, p = 0.034, p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) and the incidence of PONV was less (p = 0.001). The pH and pO
conclusionsWe suggest that ERAS use is favorably promising to achieve better maternal recovery in terms of ObsQoR and improved neonatal outcome in terms of nutrition and breastfeeding in the ERAS pathway.
trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered to clinical trials (NCT06753058 and published on 12/30/2024, 09:19) according to instructions at https://www.biomedcentral.com/getpublished/editorial-policies#trial+registration .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.