Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301783›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Pre-operative education and prehabilitation provision for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement: a national survey of current NHS practice.

Ifrah Omar, Vikki Wylde, Jodie Fogg, Michael Whitehouse, Wendy Bertram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ifrah OmarBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Vikki WyldeBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jodie FoggNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK.
Michael WhitehouseBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Wendy BertramBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Wendy.Bertram@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West and the University of the West of England Research InternshipNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation ThemeWellcome TrustWellcome Trust University of Bristol INSPIRE studentship scheme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 215,000 total hip replacements (THRs) and total knee replacements (TKRs) take place annually in the UK. Joint replacement has the longest waiting times of elective surgical treatments, with some patients waiting up to two years for surgery in the NHS. Pre-operative education and support interventions could improve both pre-operative health and optimise post-operative outcomes. However, current pre-operative NHS service provision is heterogenous and poorly described. This study aimed to describe the current services and care provided to patients on NHS waiting lists for THR and TKR.

methodsA link to a national online survey about pre-operative education and prehabilitation was sent to relevant healthcare professionals involved in the pre-operative care of patients waiting for THR or TKR surgery at a sample of high-, mid- and low-volume NHS hospitals in the UK. Participants were asked questions about what pre-operative education and pre-habilitation services were offered at their hospital, and any barriers or facilitators to delivering care. Frequency statistics were used to describe categorical data and free-text data were coded into categories.

resultsResponses were received from 29 UK hospitals across seven regions. Pre-operative education was provided to patients at 28 hospitals, primarily at single session talks supplemented with booklets. Prehabilitation was provided to patients waiting for TKR at 17 hospitals and to patients waiting for THR at 14 hospitals. It comprised strengthening exercises and advice with written information. Three hospital respondents did not know if prehabilitation was provided before TKR and four hospitals before THR. Barriers to service provision include funding, staffing, facilities, and lack of awareness/evidence on how best to deliver services.

conclusionsPrehabilitation services are not provided for all patients waiting for arthroplasty. Future work is needed to design and evaluate prehabilitation resources to optimise pre-operative health and improve patient outcomes after TKR and THR.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneePatient Education as TopicPreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseState MedicineHealth Care SurveysHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID40301783
PMCPMC12039115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.