Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301777›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

The psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner in the general practice: a realist evaluation multiple case study.

Ans Tordoir, Veerle van Laarhoven, Noortje van Duijnhoven, Peter Coolen, Enzio Boeijen, Maud van Vlerken, Carla Jutte, Miranda Laurant, Anneke van Vught

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ans TordoirSchool of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands. ans.tordoir@han.nl.
Veerle van LaarhovenSchool of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.
Noortje van DuijnhovenSchool of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.
Peter CoolenGroup Practice General Practitioners Nederweert, Burgemeester Hobusstraat 56, Nederweert, 6031 VA, The Netherlands.
Enzio BoeijenSchool of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.
Maud van VlerkenFoundation KOH, Tilburgseweg-West 100, Eindhoven, 5652 NP, The Netherlands.
Carla JutteZuyd University of Applied Sciences, Nieuw Eyckholt 300, Heerlen, 6419 DJ, The Netherlands.
Miranda LaurantSchool of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.
Anneke van VughtSchool of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems are highly prevalent worldwide and the mental health system faces significant gaps in treatment coverage due to stigma, professional shortages and accessibility issues. In the Netherlands, patients first visit their general practitioner (GP) for mental health problems, with an increasing number of people seeking mental health counselling and treatment in general practice. Dutch general practices have been experimenting with deploying psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNP) to enhance mental healthcare accessibility. How to best deploy this profession in the general practice team and everyday care, is yet unknown.

objectiveThis study aims to understand how deployment of the PMHNP in the general practice works and how it contributes to the accessibility and quality of mental primary healthcare and job satisfaction of professionals in the general practice.

methodsThis multiple case study used principles of realist evaluation methodology for data collection and analysis focusing on context, mechanism and outcome (CMO). Seven general practices employing a PMHNP, were included. Data was collected through observations, interviews and group discussions with professionals working in the general practice and patients treated by the PMHNP. Cross-case analysis involved work sessions with professionals of these seven cases.

resultsThis study identified three mechanisms that provide insight into how deploying PMHNP contributes to improved experienced accessibility and quality of mental health care, enhances job satisfaction and reduces workload especially for the GP: (1) motivation and investment; (2) familiarity and trust; and (3) equivalence and autonomy. These mechanisms were triggered in a context with the presence of (1) a vision on mental health care in general practice, (2) physical attendance of the PMHNP, (3) a patient population suited to the expertise of the PMHNP, and (4) financial possibilities.

conclusionParticipants in this study believe a transition in general practices is necessary to provide sustainable, lowtreshold mental healthcare in primary care setting. They see the PMHNP as the professional to fill this gap. To optimally deploy the PMHNP and ensure accessible, high-quality mental healthcare, the mechanisms of (1) motivation and investment, (2) familiarity and trust, and (3) equivalence and autonomy should be activated.

Indexed as

General PracticeMental DisordersMental Health ServicesNurse PractitionersPsychiatric NursingFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansJob SatisfactionMaleNetherlandsGeneral practice careMental health carePsychiatric mental health nurse practitionerRealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40301777
PMCPMC12039134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.