ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
Abatacept for acute graft versus host disease prophylaxis in children with sickle cell disease patients undergoing HLA identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abatacept reduces the risk of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) in matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT for SCD with and without adding abatacept to standard acute GVHD prophylaxis. Twenty-one patients, median age 7 years (range 2.0-14.8) received MSD HSCT with addition of 4 doses of abatacept to standard calcineurin inhibitor based acute GVHD prophylaxis while six patients, median age 9.8 years (range 1.9-14.4) underwent MSD HSCT with standard prophylaxis. One patient (4.5%) in the abatacept group developed grade II acute skin GVHD, while 3 patients (50%) in standard group developed grade II-III acute skin and gut GVHD (p = 0.022). Grade III-IV GVHD was 0% in abatacept group compared to 33% in standard group (p = 0.043). Disease-free survival was 83% in standard group at a median follow up of 11 years (IQR:9.5-13.25 years), and 100% in the abatacept group at a median follow up of 5 years (IQR:3-8 years). Our data show that addition of abatacept to calcineurin inhibitor based acute GVHD prophylaxis reduces the risk of severe acute GVHD in patients with SCD undergoing MSD HSCT without impacting disease-free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40301664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.