ArticleCommunications biology2025
Characterizing somatic mutations in ovarian cancer germline risk regions.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) genetics research has been focused on germline or somatic mutations independently. Emerging evidence suggests that the somatic mutational landscape can be shaped by the germline genetic background. In this study, we aim to unravel the role of somatic alterations within EOC germline susceptibility regions by incorporating functional annotations. We investigate somatic events, including mutational signatures, point mutations, copy number alterations, and transcription factor binding disruptions, within 33 EOC germline susceptibility regions. Our analysis identifies significant associations between candidate germline susceptibility genes and somatic mutational signatures known to be key risk factors for EOC, such as mismatch repair deficiency, age-related mutagenesis, and homologous recombination deficiency. In addition, we find somatic point mutations and copy number alterations are significantly enriched in histotype-specific active enhancers and promoters within EOC risk loci. Furthermore, we examine the impact of germline variants and somatic mutations on transcription factor binding sites, identifying cancer developmental transcription factor motifs frequently affected by both types of mutations. Overall, our study highlights the importance of integrating germline and somatic mutations with regulatory and epigenomic data to gain insights into the genetic basis of EOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.