Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301627›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Industrial production and functional profiling of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici 72 N for potential use as a swine feed additive.

Nay Zin Myo, Ratchnida Kamwa, Benjamas Khurajog, Pawiya Pupa, Wandee Sirichokchatchawan, David J Hampson, Nuvee Prapasarakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Potent Probiotic YeastACS omega · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nay Zin MyoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Ratchnida KamwaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Benjamas KhurajogDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Pawiya PupaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Wandee SirichokchatchawanCenter of Excellence in Diagnosis and Monitoring Animal Pathogens (DMAP), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
David J HampsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia.
Nuvee PrapasarakulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Nuvee.p@chula.ac.th.

Funding

the Agricultural Research Development Agency, Thailand CRP6605031420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to achieve industrial-scale production of the Thai native swine-derived probiotic strain Pediococcus acidilactici 72 N (P72N) using a cost-effective, food-grade modified medium, and to assess the efficacy of this medium by evaluating the probiotic's functional characteristics and metabolomic profile. Conventional and statistical optimization techniques were used to screen food-grade carbon sources (glucose, dextrose, sucrose) and nitrogen sources (beef extract, yeast extract, sweet whey) to develop the optimal formulation. The final medium contained 10 g/L dextrose, 45 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L sodium acetate, 2 g/L ammonium citrate, 2 g/L di-potassium hydrogen phosphate, 1 g/L Tween 80, 0.1 g/L magnesium sulfate, and 0.05 g/L manganese sulfate. This formulation achieved significantly higher viable cell counts compared to commercial MRS medium. Scale-up fermentation in 5 L and 50 L fermenters under controlled conditions (37 °C, pH 6.5, 120 rpm) yielded viable cell counts exceeding 9.60 log CFU/mL within 12 h, reducing production costs by 67-86%. P72N in the modified medium demonstrated improved tolerance to environmental stresses. Metabolomic analysis revealed that P72N produced a variety of bioactive metabolites, particularly 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid (1,4-DHNA) and indolelactic acid (ILA) which were detected in higher levels in the modified medium, demonstrating its suitability for industrial production of P72N as a potential feed additive for swine farming.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFood AdditivesPediococcus acidilacticiProbioticsAnimalsCulture MediaFermentationSwineCulture MediaFood AdditivesFeed additiveFood-grade modified mediaIndustrial productionMetabolomic analysisPediococcus acidilacticiProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID40301627
PMCPMC12041572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.