Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of nipple sparing and skin sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction based on patient reported outcomes.

Yuhang Song, Lingzi Wang, Wenqin Huang, Senyang Guo, Xinhong Wu, Hongmei Zheng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Complications, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes of nipple-sparingTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuhang SongDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer; National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Discipline, Wuhan, China. songyuhang@hust.edu.cn.
Lingzi WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer; National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Discipline, Wuhan, China.
Wenqin HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer; National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Discipline, Wuhan, China.
Senyang GuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer; National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Discipline, Wuhan, China.
Xinhong WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer; National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Discipline, Wuhan, China. wuxinhong_9@sina.com.
Hongmei ZhengDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Breast Cancer; National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Discipline, Wuhan, China. zhenghongmeicj@163.com.

Funding

Hubei Cancer Hospital Biomedical Center Research Project 2022SWZX03Hubei Cancer Hospital Biomedical Center Research Project 2022SWZX09Hubei Chen Xiaoping Science and Technology Development Foundation CXPJJH123001--2320Hubei Province Medical Youth Top Talent Project EWT [2023] 65, OncologyHubei Province Natural Science Foundation of Innovation and Development Joint Fund Projects 2024AFD454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are widely accepted surgical options for breast cancer patients undergoing immediate reconstruction. However, the impact of preserving the nipple-areolar complex on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains uncertain, particularly in clinically matched settings. This retrospective study included patients who underwent unilateral NSM or SSM followed by immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at Hubei Cancer Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were propensity score matched (2:1) based on age, body mass index, preoperative breast size, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, implant plane, and postmastectomy radiation therapy. PROs were assessed using the BREAST-Q (version 2.0) and the decision regret scale. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of satisfaction and regret. A total of 87 patients were included after matching (NSM: n = 58; SSM: n = 29). NSM patients reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts (mean 58.1 vs. 52.9, P = 0.038) and sexual well-being (mean 52.4 vs. 38.9, P = 0.035). Although psychosocial well-being and decision regret showed favorable trends in the NSM group, differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed that reduction in breast size was significantly associated with decreased satisfaction and psychosocial well-being, while increased breast size was linked to greater decision regret. No significant differences were observed in complication rates between groups. Notably, none of the SSM patients received nipple reconstruction during follow-up. NSM was associated with greater satisfaction in breast and sexual well-being compared to SSM in matched breast cancer patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction. These findings support prioritizing NSM when oncologically feasible and highlight the potential role of delayed nipple reconstruction and expectation management in improving postoperative satisfaction for SSM patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyMastectomyNipplesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesBREAST-QBreast reconstructionNipple-sparing mastectomyPatient-reported outcomesSkin-sparing mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID40301606
PMCPMC12041335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.