ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of nipple sparing and skin sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction based on patient reported outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Decade Later: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Local Recurrence, and Nipple-Areolar Recurrence Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical Burden of Breast Cancer Treatment: Implications of Mastectomy, Breast Conservation, and Reconstruction Choices.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Review
- Advanced techniques for mastopexy in patients with ptotic breasts requiring nipple-sparing mastectomy: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Management of Nipple Necrosis and Wound Complications in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Complications, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes of nipple-sparingTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
- Oncoplastic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction in Non-ideal Candidates.Cureus · 2025Article
- Psychological Outcomes After Mastectomy With vs Without Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of 5160 Patients.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are widely accepted surgical options for breast cancer patients undergoing immediate reconstruction. However, the impact of preserving the nipple-areolar complex on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains uncertain, particularly in clinically matched settings. This retrospective study included patients who underwent unilateral NSM or SSM followed by immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at Hubei Cancer Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were propensity score matched (2:1) based on age, body mass index, preoperative breast size, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, implant plane, and postmastectomy radiation therapy. PROs were assessed using the BREAST-Q (version 2.0) and the decision regret scale. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of satisfaction and regret. A total of 87 patients were included after matching (NSM: n = 58; SSM: n = 29). NSM patients reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts (mean 58.1 vs. 52.9, P = 0.038) and sexual well-being (mean 52.4 vs. 38.9, P = 0.035). Although psychosocial well-being and decision regret showed favorable trends in the NSM group, differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed that reduction in breast size was significantly associated with decreased satisfaction and psychosocial well-being, while increased breast size was linked to greater decision regret. No significant differences were observed in complication rates between groups. Notably, none of the SSM patients received nipple reconstruction during follow-up. NSM was associated with greater satisfaction in breast and sexual well-being compared to SSM in matched breast cancer patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction. These findings support prioritizing NSM when oncologically feasible and highlight the potential role of delayed nipple reconstruction and expectation management in improving postoperative satisfaction for SSM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.