ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-strategy hybrid adaptive dung beetle optimization for UAV photogrammetric 3D path planning under complex constraints.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geometrical Optimal Navigation and Path Planning-Bridging Theory, Algorithms, and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional UAV path planning necessitates strong global search capabilities due to its high-dimensional optimization nature. To address premature convergence and enhance local search efficiency in comparison to traditional DBO methods, this study proposes MSDBO, a multi-strategy fusion algorithm. The approach involves utilizing piecewise chaotic mapping to increase population diversity, integrating OOA for improved global exploration, and implementing a dynamic balance mechanism comprising Sigmoid convergence factors, adaptive t-distribution mutation, and dynamic weights. Additionally, simulated annealing is enhanced to achieve better convergence precision. Through systematic validation encompassing 21 benchmark functions, Wilcoxon tests, and CEC2021, MSDBO exhibits superior convergence accuracy and robustness when compared to seven other metaheuristic algorithms. Urban flight experiments further demonstrate MSDBO's ability to generate smoother paths with a 7.5% lower optimal cost and a 31% reduced standard deviation than DBO. These findings confirm the efficacy of MSDBO in tackling UAV path planning challenges in complex scenarios through coordinated multi-stage optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.