Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301588›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Tactile contribution extends beyond exteroception during spatially guided finger movements.

Maria Evangelia Vlachou, Juliette Legros, Cécile Sellin, Dany Paleressompoulle, Francesco Massi, Martin Simoneau, Laurence Mouchnino, Jean Blouin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Evangelia VlachouCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS (UMR 7077), Marseille, France. maria-evangelia.vlachou@univ-amu.fr.
Juliette LegrosCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS (UMR 7077), Marseille, France.
Cécile SellinCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS (UMR 7077), Marseille, France.
Dany PaleressompoulleCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS (UMR 7077), Marseille, France.
Francesco MassiDipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica ed Aerospaziale, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Martin SimoneauCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Readaptation et Integration Sociale (CIRRIS) Du CIUSSS de La Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Laurence MouchninoCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS (UMR 7077), Marseille, France.
Jean BlouinCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS (UMR 7077), Marseille, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CONV000X / ANR-17-EURE-0029/ANR 2020-CE28-0010-03Aix-Marseille Université AMX-19-IET-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, touch is associated with exteroception and is rarely considered a relevant sensory cue for controlling movements in space, unlike vision. We developed a technique to isolate and measure tactile involvement in controlling sliding finger movements over a surface. Young adults traced a 2D shape with their index finger under direct or mirror-reversed visual feedback to create a conflict between visual and somatosensory inputs. In this context, increased reliance on somatosensory input compromises movement accuracy. Based on the hypothesis that tactile cues contribute to guiding hand movements when in contact with a surface, we predicted poorer performance when the participants traced with their bare finger compared to when their tactile sensation was dampened by a smooth, rigid finger splint. The results supported this prediction. EEG source analyses revealed smaller current in the source-localized somatosensory cortex during sensory conflict when the finger directly touched the surface. This finding supports the hypothesis that, in response to mirror-reversed visual feedback, the central nervous system selectively gated task-irrelevant somatosensory inputs, thereby mitigating, though not entirely resolving, the visuo-somatosensory conflict. Together, our results emphasize touch's involvement in movement control over a surface, challenging the notion that vision predominantly governs goal-directed hand or finger movements.

Indexed as

FingersTouchTouch PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMovementPsychomotor PerformanceSomatosensory CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40301588
PMCPMC12041493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.