Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301510›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

SMART: Structured Missingness Analysis and Reconstruction Technique for credit scoring.

Seongil Han, Haemin Jung, Paul D Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seongil HanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Suwon, Hwaseong, South Korea.
Haemin JungDepartment of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju, South Korea.
Paul D YooSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of London, Birkbeck College, London, UK. paul.d.yoo@ieee.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Basel Accord emphasizes the necessity of employing internal data models to manage key credit risk components, including Probability of Default (PD), Loss Given Default (LGD), and Exposure At Default (EAD). Among these, internal datasets are critical for estimating PD, a fundamental measure of borrower creditworthiness. Nevertheless, practical application often faces challenges due to incomplete datasets, which can skew analyses and undermine the accuracy of credit scoring models. Traditional approaches to addressing missing data, such as sample deletion or mean imputation, are widely used; however, they often prove insufficient for accurate prediction. Consequently, imputation methods are typically favored over deletion, as they allow for the full utilization of available data. Recent advancements have introduced more sophisticated techniques, such as Generative Adversarial Imputation Networks (GAIN), which utilize a generative adversarial network to model data distributions and impute missing values with greater precision than conventional methods. Building on these developments, this study proposes a novel imputation approach, SMART (Structured Missingness Analysis and Reconstruction Technique) for credit scoring datasets. SMART consists of two primary stages: first, it normalizes and denoises the dataset using randomized Singular Value Decomposition (rSVD), followed by the implementation of GAIN to impute missing values. Experimental results demonstrate that SMART significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods, particularly in high missing data contexts (20%, 50%, and 80%), with improvements in imputation accuracy of 7.04%, 6.34%, and 13.38%, respectively. In conclusion, SMART represents a substantial advancement in handling incomplete credit scoring datasets, leading to more precise PD estimation and enhancing the robustness of credit risk management models.

Indexed as

Credit scoringGenerative adversarial imputation networksImputationMissing valuesRandomized singular value decomposition

Identifiers

PMID40301510
PMCPMC12041391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.