ArticleScientific reports2025
Contrastive learning and mixture of experts enables precise vector embeddings in biological databases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein language models are accidental taxonomists.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Protein Language Models are Accidental Taxonomists.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Contrastive learning and mixture of experts enables precise vector embeddings in biological databases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Annotation Vocabulary (Might Be) All You Need.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advancement of transformer neural networks has significantly enhanced the performance of sentence similarity models. However, these models often struggle with highly discriminative tasks and generate sub-optimal representations of complex documents such as peer-reviewed scientific literature. With the increased reliance on retrieval augmentation and search, representing structurally and thematically-varied research documents as concise and descriptive vectors is crucial. This study improves upon the vector embeddings of scientific text by assembling domain-specific datasets using co-citations as a similarity metric, focusing on biomedical domains. We introduce a novel Mixture of Experts (MoE) extension pipeline applied to pretrained BERT models, where every multi-layer perceptron section is copied into distinct experts. Our MoE variants are trained to classify whether two publications are cited together (co-cited) in a third paper based on their scientific abstracts across multiple biological domains. Notably, because of our unique routing scheme based on special tokens, the throughput of our extended MoE system is exactly the same as regular transformers. This holds promise for versatile and efficient One-Size-Fits-All transformer networks for encoding heterogeneous biomedical inputs. Our methodology marks advancements in representation learning and holds promise for enhancing vector database search and compilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.