ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced fabrication and characterization of thin-film composite polyamide membranes for superior performance in reverse osmosis desalination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Bio-Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Prospects-A Comprehensive Critical Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Review
- Dual-Functional Coatings for RO Membranes: Optimizing Graphene Oxide and Polydopamine for Fouling and Scaling Control.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thin film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes are crucial for efficient reverse osmosis (RO) desalination, offering high selectivity and permeability. This study investigates the fabrication and optimization of TFC membranes on polysulfone supports, focusing on their structural, morphological, and performance properties for enhanced desalination efficiency using the phase inversion technique, a method that enables precise control over membrane structure. Key fabrication parameters including the concentrations of m-phenylene diamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC), and the immersion times for both monomers were systematically varied to investigate their impact on membrane hydrophilicity, morphology, and structure. Hydrophilicity was assessed via contact angle measurements, Scanning electron microscopy was used to characterize the morphology (SEM), and structural properties were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The RO membranes' desalination performance was evaluated by measuring water flux and salt rejection in a cross-flow setup with saline water (10,000 ppm) under controlled processing conditions. Results indicated that variations in MPD and TMC concentrations, as well as immersion times, significantly influenced membrane hydrophilicity and pore structure, affecting water flux and salt rejection. The maximum salt rejection and water flux for the prepared thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane were 98.6% and 19.1 L/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.