Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A swin transformer and CNN fusion framework for accurate Parkinson disease classification in MRI.

Sayyed Shahid Hussain, Pir Masoom Shah, Hussain Dawood, Xu Degang, Ahmad Alshamayleh, Muhammad Adnan Khan, Taher M Ghazal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sayyed Shahid HussainSchool of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.
Pir Masoom ShahSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410010, China.
Hussain DawoodSchool of Computing, Skyline University College, Sharjah, UAE.
Xu DegangSchool of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China. dgxu@csu.edu.cn.
Ahmad AlshamaylehDepartment of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Muhammad Adnan KhanSchool of Computing, Skyline University College, Sharjah, UAE.
Taher M GhazalNetworks and Cybersecurity Department, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. taher.ghazal@ieee.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease ranks as the second most prevalent neurological disorder after Alzheimer's disease. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively employed in Parkinson's disease (PD) detection using MR images. However, CNN models generally focus on local features while prone to capture global representations. On the other hand, the vision transformer (ViT) excels at capturing global features through its self-attention mechanism, but it compromises local feature representations. Additionally, the varying magnitude of MR data poses a challenge for ViT, potentially leading to the gradient vanishing problem. To address these limitations, this paper proposed a novel framework that combines the Swin-Transformer and CNN to capture both local and global features effectively. To mitigate the gradient vanishing issue in ViT, we used skipped connections and cosine attention mechanism in VIT that preserves the output distribution regardless of input magnitude variations. The proposed model comprises three primary blocks: Transformer-block, convolutional block, and dense-block. The input image is processed concurrently by the cosine transformer and convolutional block. Subsequently, the extracted features from both blocks are concatenated and fed to the dense block for decision-making. The proposed model achieved promesing results of 96%, 97%, 95%, and 95% in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve, respectively.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerParkinson DiseaseAlgorithmsHumansCNNCosine similarityMRIParkinson’s diseaseSwin-transformer

Identifiers

PMID40301455
PMCPMC12041535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.