Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301452›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An edge sensitivity based gradient attack on graph isomorphic networks for graph classification problems.

Srinitish Srinivasan, Chandraumakantham OmKumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Srinitish SrinivasanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Chandraumakantham OmKumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. omkumar.cu@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks have gained popularity over the past few years. Their ability to model relationships between entities of the same and different kind, represent molecules, model flow etc. have made them a go to tool for researchers. However, owing to the abstract nature of graphs, there exists no ideal transformation to represent nodes and edges in the euclidean space. Moreover, GNNs are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks. However, a gradient based attack based on latent space embeddings does not exist in the GNN literature. Such attacks, classified as white box attacks, tamper with latent space representation of graphs without creating any noticeable difference in the overall distribution. Developing and testing GNN models based on such attacks on graph classification tasks would enable researchers to understand and develop stronger and more robust classification systems. Further, adversarial attack tests in the GNN literature have been performed on weaker, less representative neural network architectures. In order to tackle these gaps in literature, we propose a white box gradient based attack developed from contrastive latent space representations. Further, we develop a strong base(victim) learning spectral and spatial properties of graphs with consideration of isomorphic properties. We experimentally validate this model on 4 benchmark datasets in the molecular property prediction literature where our model outperformed over 75% of all LLM-based architectures. On attacking this model with our proposed adversarial attack strategy, the overall performance drops at an average of 25% thereby clearing a few gaps in the existent literature. The code for our paper can be found at https://github.com/Deceptrax123/An-edge-sensitivity-based-gradient-attack-on-GIN-for-inductive-problems.

Identifiers

PMID40301452
PMCPMC12041539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.