ArticleScientific reports2025
A neural network model for the evolution of reconstructive social learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning from others is an important adaptation. However, the evolution of social learning and its role in the spread of socially transmitted information are not well understood. Few models of social learning account for the fact that socially transmitted information must be reconstructed by the learner, based on the learner's previous knowledge and cognition. To represent the reconstructive nature of social learning, we present a modelling framework that incorporates the evolution of a neural network and a simple yet biologically realistic learning mechanism. The framework encompasses various forms of individual and social learning and allows the investigation of their interplay. Individual-based simulations reveal that an effective neural network structure rapidly evolves, leading to adaptive inborn behaviour in static environments, pure individual learning in highly variable environments, and a combination of individual and social learning in environments of intermediate stability. However, the evolutionary outcome depends strongly on the type of social learning (social guidance versus social instruction) and the order of individual and social learning. Moreover, the evolutionary dynamics of social learning can be surprisingly complex, with replicate simulations converging to alternative outcomes. We discuss the relevance of our modelling framework for cultural evolution and suggest future avenues of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.