Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301427›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A simple yet effective approach for predicting disease spread using mathematically-inspired diffusion-informed neural networks.

ByeongChang Jeong, Yeon Ju Lee, Cheol E Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

ByeongChang JeongDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Ju LeeDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Cheol E HanDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea. cheolhan@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

Institute for Information and Communication Technology Planning and Evaluation, Republic of Korea IITP-2024-RS-2023-00258971Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI22C1464National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2C1008360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has highlighted the importance of mathematical epidemic models like the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model, for understanding disease spread dynamics. However, enhancing their predictive accuracy complicates parameter estimation. To address this, we proposed a novel model that integrates traditional mathematical modeling with deep learning which has shown improved predicted power across diverse fields. The proposed model includes a simple artificial neural network (ANN) for regional disease incidences, and a graph convolutional neural network (GCN) to capture spread to adjacent regions. GCNs are a recent deep learning algorithm designed to learn spatial relationship from graph-structured data. We applied the model to COVID-19 incidences in Spain to evaluate its performance. It achieved a 0.9679 correlation with the test data, outperforming previous models with fewer parameters. By leveraging the efficient training methods of deep learning, the model simplifies parameter estimation while maintaining alignment with the mathematical framework to ensure interpretability. The proposed model may allow the more robust and insightful analyses by leveraging the generalization power of deep learning and theoretical foundations of the mathematical models.

Indexed as

COVID-19Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2SpainArtificial neural networksCOVID-19Deep learningGraph convolutional neural network

Identifiers

PMID40301427
PMCPMC12041234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.