ArticleScientific reports2025
Cost utility analysis of antibiotics compared with operative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-Year Healthcare Utilization and Costs After Emergency Department Encounters for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: A Statewide Observational Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- The Role of Emerging Immune-Inflammatory Indexes in the Preoperative Differentiation of Complicated and Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal condition affecting general surgical practice. Recently, conservative treatment with antibiotics has been considered as an alternative. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate if antibiotics could be cost-effective compared to laparoscopic appendectomy or open appendectomy. A prospective study was undertaken to estimate health-related quality of life for antibiotic and operative treatment, and to ascertain costs in a cohort. A societal perspective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 1 year after surgery was estimated. A probabilistic sensitivity analyses was performed. ICERs were estimated comparisons between individual antibiotics, laparoscopic appendectomy, and open appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Antibiotics showed improved cost savings compared to operative treatments with an ICER of -113,973.09 USD per quality adjusted life year at 1 year. Based on one year findings, antibiotics represent a lower cost treatment option with better cost-utility compared to operative treatment options in uncomplicated acute appendicitis patients. As such, antibiotic treatment can be initially considered as an alternative option where resources are limited to minimize complication rates associated with operative treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.