ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of grafting compatibility and prediction modelling in Sapindus mukorossi.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Physiological and Biochemical Responses Between Compatible and Incompatible Graft Combinations ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grafting compatibility refers to the successful healing between stock and scion, as well as the normal functioning of their tissues. This article investigates the survival rates and growth conditions of various Sapindus grafting combinations and establishes a new evaluation system for Sapindus grafting compatibility. This system aims to provide theoretical support for predicting Sapindus grafting compatibility and enhancing the development of improved varieties. The study utilizes 15 Sapindus grafting combinations as research materials, assesses their survival rates and growth conditions, employs the CRITIC method to calculate weights, and develops a Sapindus grafting compatibility evaluation model. By analyzing the physiological characteristics of the scion leaves from these 15 grafting combinations, variance analysis, cluster analysis, and linear regression models were utilized to assess the accuracy of the grafting compatibility evaluation model. The results indicate that the growth of grafted plants serves as a critical evaluation index of grafting compatibility, providing a more scientific approach than relying solely on survival rate metrics. This research offers a theoretical foundation and data support for predicting Sapindus grafting compatibility; an effective prediction model will substantially enhance the efficiency of breeding and promoting improved varieties, thereby fostering the growth of the Sapindus industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.