Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301289›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Attention-Based Dual-Path Deep Learning for Blood Cell Image Classification Using ConvNeXt and Swin Transformer.

Şafak Kılıç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Şafak KılıçDepartment of Software Engineering, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey. safakkilic@kayseri.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-7638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving field of medical image analysis, the precise classification of blood cells plays a crucial role in diagnosing and monitoring numerous hematological disorders. Traditional methods, while effective, often require significant manual effort and expert knowledge, leading to potential delays and inconsistencies in diagnosis. Addressing these challenges, this paper introduces a groundbreaking dual-path deep learning architecture that synergistically combines ConvNeXt and Swin Transformer networks. This innovative approach leverages the strengths of convolutional neural networks for local feature extraction and transformers for global context integration, effectively capturing the complex morphological variations in blood cells. Furthermore, the incorporation of a Multi-scale Preprocessing Module (MPM) significantly enhances the image quality, employing techniques such as local contrast enhancement, global illumination normalization, and morphological feature enhancement to improve the visibility and differentiation of cellular features. Tested on a comprehensive dataset of 17,092 blood cell images, our model achieves an unprecedented accuracy of 99.98%, demonstrating superior performance over existing methods. This level of accuracy not only underscores the effectiveness of our model but also highlights its potential to serve as a reliable tool in clinical settings, facilitating faster and more accurate blood cell analysis. By automating the classification process with high precision, our approach promises to enhance diagnostic workflows, reduce the workload on medical professionals, and ultimately contribute to better patient outcomes in the field of hematology.

Indexed as

Blood CellsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBlood cell classificationConvNeXtFeature fusionMedical image analysisSwin Transformer

Identifiers

PMID40301289
PMCPMC12920894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.