ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Integrating Implementation Outcomes into Effectiveness Studies: A Practical Guide for Clinical Interventionists.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A tool to evaluate the integration of implementation science methods in a research project: The Dissemination and Implementation Research Capability Self Survey (DIRC-SS).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- What scientific inferences can be made with randomized implementation rollout trials.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Implementation Factors Influencing Peer-Delivered Behavioral Evidence-Based Interventions for Substance Use Disorders: A Scoping Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Article
- An introduction to implementation science in rehabilitation medicine.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Designing effectiveness studies with implementation in mind can allow interventionists to translate their research into real-world practice. Implementation outcomes measure how much and how well a particular intervention was implemented and can provide valuable insights into any heterogeneity in effectiveness outcomes. As part of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) Helping to End Addiction Long-term® (HEAL) Initiative's Data2Action program, a workgroup of the Research Adoption Support Center (RASC) was tasked with creating a resource guide to aid clinical interventionists in integrating implementation outcomes into their research plans. This paper aims to provide a plain-language, pragmatic guide to implementation outcomes for clinical interventionists, including key considerations for each outcome and examples of implementation-effectiveness studies that reported implementation outcomes. We conclude by discussing the limitations of our guide and implementation outcome reporting more broadly. We offer suggestions for implementation scientists and clinical interventionists to work toward a common goal of improved implementation outcome reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.