Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301204›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025

Deep learning based automated left atrial segmentation and flow quantification of real time phase contrast MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Justin Baraboo, Amanda DiCarlo, Haben Berhane, Daming Shen, Rod Passman, Daniel C Lee, Patrick M McCarthy, Rishi Arora, Dan Kim, Michael Markl

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Justin BarabooNorthwestern Biomedical Engineering, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Justin.Baraboo@northwestern.edu.
Amanda DiCarloNorthwestern Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Haben BerhaneNorthwestern Biomedical Engineering, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Daming ShenNorthwestern Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rod PassmanNorthwestern Medicine, Cardiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Daniel C LeeNorthwestern Medicine, Cardiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Patrick M McCarthyNorthwestern Medicine, Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rishi AroraNorthwestern Medicine, Cardiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dan KimNorthwestern Biomedical Engineering, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael MarklNorthwestern Biomedical Engineering, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

New and Disruptive Therapeutic Approaches to Target Fundamental Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Atrial FibrillationR35HL161249 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Rishi Arora · 2022 to 2026
$5.1M
Graduate Training Program for Magnetic Resonance ImagingT32EB025766 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Michael Markl · 2019 to 2026
$1.6M
MRI of Left Atrial Hemodynamic Disorders in Atrial FibrillationR21AG055954 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KIM, DANIEL, MARKL, MICHAEL · 2017 to 2018
$487k
Arrhythmia-resolved 5D Flow MRI in Atrial Fibrillation and StrokeF31HL165915 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BARABOO, JUSTIN J · 2022 to 2023
$86k
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging And Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health T32EB025766NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL165915NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL161249NIA NIH HHS R21 AG055954NIA NIH HHS R21AG055954NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB025766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real time 2D phase contrast (RTPC) MRI is useful for flow quantification in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, but data analysis requires time-consuming anatomical contouring for many cardiac time frames. Our goal was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for fully automated left atrial (LA) flow quantification. Forty-four AF patients underwent cardiac MRI including LA RTPC, collecting a median of 358 timeframes per scan. 15,307 semi-manual derived RTPC LA contours comprised ground truth for CNN training, validation, and testing. CNN vs. human performance was assessed using Dice scores (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and flow measures (stasis, velocities, flow). LA contour DSC across all patients were similar to human inter-observer DSC (0.90 vs. 0.93) and a median 4.6 mm [3.5-5.9 mm] HD. There was no impact of heart rate variability on contouring quality (low vs. high variability DSC: 0.92 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p = 0.95). CNN based LA flow quantification showed good to excellent agreement with semi-manual analysis (r > 0.90) and small bias in Bland-Altman analysis for mean velocity (-0.10 cm/s), stasis (1%), and net flow (-2.4 ml/s). This study demonstrated the feasibility of CNN based LA flow analysis with good agreements in LA contours and flow measures and resilience to heartbeat variability in AF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrial Function, LeftDeep LearningHeart AtriaImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAgedAutomationBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationAtrial fibrillationCardiac magnetic resonance imagingDeep learningImage processingReal time phase contrast

Identifiers

PMID40301204
PMCPMC12162695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.