ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Radiological approach to metatarsalgia in current practice: an educational review.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Research Trends in Metatarsal Stress Fractures in Athletes.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Anatomical Validation of a Selective Anesthetic Block Test to Differentiate Morton's Neuroma from Mechanical Metatarsalgia.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metatarsalgia, characterized by forefoot pain, is frequent and is primarily due to foot static disorders. Initial evaluation with weight-bearing radiographs is essential, allowing precise analysis of the architecture of the foot. Ultrasound is useful for soft tissue and tendon examination and provides the best clinical correlation. Computed Tomography provides detailed bone assessment and is helpful for pre-operative planning. Magnetic Resonance Imaging is the gold standard modality, offering superior soft tissue contrast. The common causes of metatarsalgia include hallux pathologies (hallux valgus, hallux rigidus, and sesamoid issues), bursitis (intermetatarsal and subcapitellar), Morton's neuroma, second ray syndrome, stress fractures, and systemic pathologies affecting the foot. Combining clinical and imaging data is crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective management of metatarsalgia. Post-traumatic causes of metatarsalgia are beyond the scope of this article and will not be described. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Metatarsalgia, the pain of the forefoot, necessitates accurate imaging for diagnosis and management. This review critically assesses imaging techniques and diagnostic approaches, aiming to enhance radiological practice and support effective therapeutic decision-making. KEY POINTS: Metatarsalgia commonly results from foot static disorders, requiring weight-bearing radiographs for assessment. MRI is often the gold standard examination, but ultrasound is complementary, allowing for a radioclinical approach with dynamic examinations. The radiologist is crucial in diagnosing metatarsalgia, providing essential imaging, and guiding treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.