ArticleMemory & cognition2025
Illusory feelings of prediction during déjà entendu: An auditory analog to illusory feelings of prediction during déjà vu.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Déjà vu-the strange, inexplicable sensation that a current situation has been experienced before-is often accompanied by an illusory feeling of knowing regarding what is about to happen next. Studies have shown that when déjà vu occurs during virtual tours of scenes, an illusory sense of being able to predict the direction of the next turn frequently accompanies it. The present study examined whether a similar illusory sense of prediction might also accompany the auditory analog of déjà vu known as déjà entendu. Participants heard simple piano pieces, some of which had been experimentally familiarized through previous exposure to some of their features (e.g., isolated rhythm). Upon stopping each piano piece, participants made a familiarity judgment, a déjà entendu judgment, a feeling-of-prediction judgment, a prediction regarding the likely characteristics of the next note, and finally, an identification attempt. In Experiment 1, the prediction judgments were about the contour of the proceeding note (will ascend vs. descend in pitch). In Experiment 2, prediction judgments were about the location of the next note (left vs. right speaker), which was randomly predetermined and therefore unpredictable. Déjà entendu reports were significantly more likely to be accompanied by a feeling of prediction for the proceeding note's contour or location. However, these feelings were illusory, as participants did not show above-chance prediction accuracy in Experiment 1 concerning song contour, and predicting the proceeding note's location was not possible in Experiment 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40301175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.