ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Evaluating CSPG4 expression in esophageal basaloid squamous cell carcinoma and conventional squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in China.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (EBSCC) is a rare subtype of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that might be misdiagnosed or missed in clinical practice. Through RNA sequencing on 20 pure EBSCC and 11 poorly differentiated ESCC samples, we identified CSPG4 as a potential marker for EBSCC at the mRNA level, and verified with CSPG4 immunohistochemical staining in these cases. Then we assessed the value of CSPG4 expression in differential diagnosis and prognosis in EBSCC cases (n = 360) and conventional ESCC cases (n = 160) from 11 different institutions with whole-tissue sections. CSPG4 had acceptable discriminatory capacity for EBSCC, with an AUC ROC of 0.891. The optimal cutoff value for the H-score determined by ROC curve analysis was 77.5, with 82.7% sensitivity and 79.9% specificity. In well-moderately differentiated ESCC with CSPG4 expression, staining was mostly observed on the edge of the tumor nest or infiltration front, with different expression pattern from EBSCC. The H-scores of CSPG4 expression for the EBSCC component were higher than those for other components in the same tissue section (P < 0.05). The expression level of CSPG4 was similar in groups with different percentages of the EBSCC component (P > 0.05). In additional 505 ESCC patients, patients with high CSPG4 expression had decreased DFS and OS, especially in stage I-II disease (P < 0.001). The similar prognostic significance was also found in EBSCC. Our data indicate that CSPG4 is not only a sensitive but also a specific marker for the diagnosis of EBSCC. CSPG4 might also be a prognostic marker for ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40301136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.