ArticleClinical and experimental dermatology2025
Effects of formalin fixation on ex vivo confocal microscopy imaging: towards rapid pathology.
Article in Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ex vivo confocal microscopy (EVCM) rapidly images excised tissues at near-histopathological resolution, bypassing the time-consuming and labour-intensive tissue processing required for conventional histopathological evaluation. Thus far, the technique has been used to image only fresh or frozen tissues, which are challenging to transport, limiting its use to specialized centres. However, this technique could be extremely beneficial for primary health centres without histopathology laboratories, providing access to rapid pathology. For this, tissues would need to be transported in a preservative to maintain their integrity. Formalin is an excellent preservative that is readily available in clinics. We tested its effect on tissues evaluated by EVCM at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 24 h, 3 days, 5 days and 7 days after fixation and compared the images acquired with images from fresh tissue (baseline). Sixty images were acquired from normal skin tissues and tumours and analysed by a dermatopathologist blinded to the histopathology diagnosis. Normal tissue structures and tumours were correctly identified at all timepoints. Tissue became easier to handle after fixation, and photobleaching was not seen in fixed tissues. Using formalin would also preserve tissue morphology for ancillary studies. Our pilot work sets the stage for future large-scale studies and aids in widespread adaptation of this technique beyond specialized centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.