ArticleJournal of anatomy2025
The evolution of an "owl-like" auditory system in harriers: Anatomical evidence.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of an "owl-like" auditory system in harriers: Anatomical evidence.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- Implementation of a Palliative Surgical Oncology Rotation to Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship Training.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing is crucial for predators to detect hidden prey. Owls are perhaps the best example of predators with extreme auditory abilities and anatomical specializations that enhance prey localization by sound alone. Such specializations include enlarged acoustic meatus, asymmetrical ears, and enlarged auditory brain nuclei. Harriers (Circus spp.), medium-sized diurnal hawks, have similar sound-based hunting strategies and abilities to localize sound sources like owls, but whether they have the same anatomical adaptations remains unknown. We provide a quantitative analysis of the harrier's auditory system, combining histology and microCT scanning to analyze both brain and skull anatomy. Harriers differ greatly from other hawks in having enlarged acoustic meatus and expanded auditory brainstem nuclei (nucleus magnocellularis and nucleus laminaris). These are up to 3× and 12× larger, respectively, than in other hawks and are comparable in size to those of owls. However, harriers do not show other traits found in owls such as obvious ear asymmetry, an enlarged endosseous cochlear duct, or an expansion of other auditory nuclei that are enlarged in owls. These data suggest the ability of harriers to localize sound sources arises, in part, from the expansion of two auditory brainstem nuclei that are crucial to calculating interaural timing differences and determining the azimuthal location of sounds. The extent to which harriers can also accurately calculate the elevational component of a sound remains uncertain, but based on our analyses, it seems unlikely that they are as accurate as asymmetrically eared owls. We conclude that the anatomy of the harrier auditory system is "owl-like," and their ability to accurately locate prey via auditory cues is likely enhanced by their unique hunting behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.