ReviewJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
Self-injection experiences among transgender people on injectable gender-affirming hormone therapy: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Subcutaneous Versus Intramuscular Estradiol Administration for Feminizing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people may self-administer injectable estradiol or testosterone therapy for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). Knowledge about injection-related safety and injection adherence for TGD people remains to be determined.
objectivesTo determine the types of injection-related safety issues and medication adherence issues reported in the literature for TGD people on injectable GAHT. Our secondary objective was to identify opportunities for pharmacists to enhance the self-injection experience for TGD people on injectable GAHT.
methodsWe examined the literature to determine the types of issues TGD people experience when prescribed injectable GAHT. We searched for English language publications in PubMed and Google Scholar from inception to 5 August 2024 (e.g., "transgender," "nonbinary," "self-inject∗," "estrogens," and "testosterone") and included original research publications that assessed 1 of 3 injection-related domains: Safety (injection site-related reactions or pain, psychological safety around injections), injection-related medication administration (individual self-injection practices and preferences including family or caregiver support administering injections, access to appropriate injection supplies, continuation of injections, patient-reported comfort) and teaching and assessment of injection practices by a pharmacist or other health care provider (clinic- or pharmacy-based injection counseling or follow-up assessments). We excluded articles that did not describe whether GAHT was self-injected and publications about long-acting injectable testosterone undecanoate, as trained providers administer this medication.
resultsSeven publications discussed at least 1 of the 3 injection-related domains. Investigators used various methods for assessing these elements across publications. Although self-injected GAHT was well-tolerated overall, most publications reported injection site reactions that were managed while continuing self-injected GAHT. Gaps included comprehensive teaching and assessment of individual self-injection practices long-term.
conclusionBased on the types of injection-related challenges identified, pharmacists, as one of the most accessible health care providers in the United States, are well-positioned to intervene and improve the experience of patients using injectable GAHT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.