Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40300626›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Evolutionary dynamics of nascent multicellular lineages.

Guilhem Doulcier, Philippe Remigi, Daniel Rexin, Paul B Rainey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evolutionary dynamics of nascent multicellular lineages.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guilhem DoulcierDepartment of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New SouthWales 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3720-9089
Philippe RemigiLaboratory of Biophysics and Evolution, ESPCI, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9023-3788
Daniel RexinLaboratory of Biophysics and Evolution, ESPCI, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-8549
Paul B RaineyDepartment of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0879-5795

Funding

John Templeton FoundationMarsden Fund Council/Royal Society of New ZealandMax-Planck-GesellschaftUniversité de Recherche Paris Sciences et Lettres
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of multicellular organisms involves the emergence of cellular collectives that eventually become units of selection in their own right. The process can be facilitated by ecological conditions that impose heritable variance in fitness on nascent collectives, with long-term persistence depending on the capacity of competing lineages to transition reliably between soma- and germ-like stages of proto-life cycles. Prior work with experimental bacterial populations showed rapid increases in collective-level fitness, with the capacity to switch between life cycle phases being a particular focus of selection. Here, we report experiments in which the most successful lineage from the earlier study was further propagated for 10 life cycle generations under regimes that required different investments in the soma-like phase. To explore the adaptive significance of switching, a control was included in which reliable transitioning between life cycle phases was abolished. The switch proved central to the maintenance of fitness. Moreover, in a non-switch treatment, where solutions to producing a robust and enduring soma-phase were required, the evolution of

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBayesian networkecological scaffoldingevolutionary transitions in individualityexperimental evolutiongenealogiesmetapopulationsmulticellularity

Identifiers

PMID40300626
PMCPMC12040459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.