ArticleMedical image analysis2025
"Recon-all-clinical": Cortical surface reconstruction and analysis of heterogeneous clinical brain MRI.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility, image quality, and analytic usability of mobile 64 mT ultra-low-field MRI for infant brain imaging at 3 and 12 months in southern Malawi.Journal of magnetic resonance open · 2026Article
- MRI-based cortical morphometry in traumatic brain injury: a pilot longitudinal study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Cross-disorder comparison of brain structures among 4836 individuals with mental disorders and controls utilizing danish population-based clinical MRI scans.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- AI segmentation requires accounting for brain size to maintain performance on developmental MRI cohorts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Standardizing TMS Intensity Across Different Coils Using Individualized Electric Field Modeling.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Brain charts for neuroanatomical sex differences across the human lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From Low Field to High Value: Robust Cortical Mapping From Low-Field MRI.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Improving Neuropathological Reconstruction Fidelity via AI Slice Imputation.Research square · 2026Article
- Brain-age in ultra-low-field MRI: How well does it work?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- BrainTRACE (Brain Tumor Registration and Cortical Electrocorticography): A novel tool for localizing electrocorticography electrodes in patients with brain tumors.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2025Article
- Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: a roadmap.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Systematic protocol to identify 'clinical controls' for paediatric neuroimaging research from clinically acquired brain MRIs.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A systematic protocol to identify "clinical controls" for pediatric neuroimaging research from clinically acquired brain MRIs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The FinnBrain multimodal neonatal template and atlas collection.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface-based analysis of the cerebral cortex is ubiquitous in human neuroimaging with MRI. It is crucial for tasks like cortical registration, parcellation, and thickness estimation. Traditionally, such analyses require high-resolution, isotropic scans with good gray-white matter contrast, typically a T1-weighted scan with 1 mm resolution. This requirement precludes application of these techniques to most MRI scans acquired for clinical purposes, since they are often anisotropic and lack the required T1-weighted contrast. To overcome this limitation and enable large-scale neuroimaging studies using vast amounts of existing clinical data, we introduce recon-all-clinical, a novel methodology for cortical reconstruction, registration, parcellation, and thickness estimation for clinical brain MRI scans of any resolution and contrast. Our approach employs a hybrid analysis method that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained with domain randomization to predict signed distance functions (SDFs), and classical geometry processing for accurate surface placement while maintaining topological and geometric constraints. The method does not require retraining for different acquisitions, thus simplifying the analysis of heterogeneous clinical datasets. We evaluated recon-all-clinical on multiple public datasets like ADNI, HCP, AIBL, OASIS and including a large clinical dataset of over 9,500 scans. The results indicate that our method produces geometrically precise cortical reconstructions across different MRI contrasts and resolutions, consistently achieving high accuracy in parcellation. Cortical thickness estimates are precise enough to capture aging effects, independently of MRI contrast, even though accuracy varies with slice thickness. Our method is publicly available at https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/recon-all-clinical, enabling researchers to perform detailed cortical analysis on the huge amounts of already existing clinical MRI scans. This advancement may be particularly valuable for studying rare diseases and underrepresented populations where research-grade MRI data is scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.