Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40300323›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Identifying mating events of group-housed broiler breeders via bio-inspired deep learning models.

Venkat U C Bodempudi, Guoming Li, J Hunter Mason, Jeanna L Wilson, Tianming Liu, Khaled M Rasheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Venkat U C BodempudiDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Institute for Artificial Intelligence, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Guoming LiDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Institute for Artificial Intelligence, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Electronic address: gmli@uga.edu.
J Hunter MasonDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jeanna L WilsonDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Tianming LiuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Khaled M RasheedInstitute for Artificial Intelligence, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating behaviors are crucial for bird welfare, reproduction, and productivity in breeding flocks. During mating, a rooster mounts a hen, which may result in the hen overlapping or disappearing from top-view of a vision system. The objective of this research was to develop Deep learning models (DLM) to identify mating behavior based on bird count changes and bio-characteristics of mating. Twenty broiler breeder hens and 2-3 roosters (56 weeks) of the Ross 708 breed were monitored in four experimental pens. The DLM framework included a bird detection model, data filtering algorithms based on mating duration, and logic frameworks for mating identification based on bird count changes. Pretrained models of object detection (You Only Look Once Version 7 and 8, YOLOv7 and YOLOv8), tracking (YOLOv7 or YOLOv8 with Deep Simple Online Real-time Tracking (SORT), StrongSORT, and ByteTrack), and segmentation (Segment Anything Model2 (SAM2), YOLOv8-segmentation, Track Anything) were comparatively evaluated for bird detection, and YOLOv8l object detection model was selected due to balanced performance in processing speed (8 seconds per frame) and accuracy (75 % Mean Average Precision (mAP)). With custom training, the best performance of detecting broiler breeders via YOLOv8l was over 0.939 precision, recall, mAP50, mAP95, and F1 score for training and 0.95 positive and negative predicted values for testing. After comparing 24 scenarios of mating duration and 32 scenarios of time interval, a mating duration of 3-9 seconds and the time intervals of T-3 to T+12 seconds based on manual observation were incorporated into the framework to filter out unnecessary data and retain keyframes for further processing, significantly reducing the processing speed by a factor of 10. The optimized framework was effectively able to detect the birds and identify the mating behavior with 0.92 accuracy compared to other YOLO detection plus logic frameworks. Mating event identification via the developed DLM framework fluctuated among different time of a day and bird ages due to bird overlapping, gathering densities, and occlusions. By automating this process, breeders can efficiently monitor and analyze mating behaviors, facilitating timely interventions and adjustments in housing and management practices to optimize broiler breeder fertility, genetics, and overall productivity.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryChickensDeep LearningSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleArtificial intelligenceBehavior detectionComputer visionPoultryPrecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40300323
PMCPMC12434257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.