ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2025
Rate-dependent drug effects: History and contemporary implications.
Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual sigma receptor/dopamine transporter inhibition and the union of pharmacology and experimental psychology.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Review
- Nicotine enhances the ability of cues to control behavior and evoke dopamine release in the dorsolateral striatum.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present review provides a history and current significance of the rate-dependency concept describing the behavioral effects of drugs. The concept was originally formulated by P. B. Dews from observations of methamphetamine effects on behavior controlled by schedules of reinforcement. Dews suggested that the drug increased low rates and decreased high rates of responding, and subsequent studies reported an inverse linear relation between change in response rate and its rate under control conditions. Several hypotheses purported to explain rate-dependent drug effects and challenges to the interpretations of those effects are discussed. Evidence for the widespread presence of rate dependencies indicates that to make coherent experiments addressing questions involving environmental factors purportedly influencing drug effects, response rate needs to be controlled. Several examples from the literature in which different conditions are examined on a wide range of control response rates show those conditions to alter rate-dependency relations. Given those differing rate dependencies, examples are discussed of how comparisons of drug effects under different environmental conditions at a single response rate can lead to flawed conclusions. It is suggested that by examining how any environmental factor influences the behavioral effects of drugs over a wide range of control response rates leads to more powerful and generalizable findings that can better advance the field of behavioral pharmacology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Studies of drug effects on behavior in laboratory settings often use schedules of reinforcement to maintain rates and temporal patterns of responding, with drug effects often inversely related to control response rates. Because of response-rate dependencies, unambiguous assessments of the environmental factors influencing drug effects require coincident assessments of response rates. The most powerful experiments examine the effects of those factors over a wide range of control response rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.