Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40300256›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2025

Rate-dependent drug effects: History and contemporary implications.

Jonathan L Katz

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan L KatzPsychobiology Section, Intramural Research Program, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: jlkatz@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review provides a history and current significance of the rate-dependency concept describing the behavioral effects of drugs. The concept was originally formulated by P. B. Dews from observations of methamphetamine effects on behavior controlled by schedules of reinforcement. Dews suggested that the drug increased low rates and decreased high rates of responding, and subsequent studies reported an inverse linear relation between change in response rate and its rate under control conditions. Several hypotheses purported to explain rate-dependent drug effects and challenges to the interpretations of those effects are discussed. Evidence for the widespread presence of rate dependencies indicates that to make coherent experiments addressing questions involving environmental factors purportedly influencing drug effects, response rate needs to be controlled. Several examples from the literature in which different conditions are examined on a wide range of control response rates show those conditions to alter rate-dependency relations. Given those differing rate dependencies, examples are discussed of how comparisons of drug effects under different environmental conditions at a single response rate can lead to flawed conclusions. It is suggested that by examining how any environmental factor influences the behavioral effects of drugs over a wide range of control response rates leads to more powerful and generalizable findings that can better advance the field of behavioral pharmacology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Studies of drug effects on behavior in laboratory settings often use schedules of reinforcement to maintain rates and temporal patterns of responding, with drug effects often inversely related to control response rates. Because of response-rate dependencies, unambiguous assessments of the environmental factors influencing drug effects require coincident assessments of response rates. The most powerful experiments examine the effects of those factors over a wide range of control response rates.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansReinforcement ScheduleBehavioral pharmacologyP. B. DewsRate dependencySchedule-controlled behaviorStimulants

Identifiers

PMID40300256
PMCPMC12163484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.