ArticlePloS one2025
Sight-over-sound effect depends on interaction between evaluators' musical experience and auditory-visual integration: An examination using Japanese brass band competition recordings.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ancillary body movements in piano performance: a critical narrative review of structural coupling, audience cues, and cognitive-scaffolding claims.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- When eyes outvote ears: Revisiting Tsay's Sight-Over-Sound effect in music performance evaluation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sight-over-sound effect, in which visual information dominates auditory cues in musical evaluations, challenges the common belief that sound is the primary factor in music evaluation. However, the replicability of the sight-over-sound effect remains controversial across different musical genres and contexts. Here, we investigated the sight-over-sound effect using recordings from Japanese brass band competitions with carefully controlled musical pieces and camera angles. Adult participants (age: 34.81 ± 11.71 years [mean ± standard deviation]) were divided into three groups based on their brass band and musical experience. Of the 301 participants, 171 were brass band musicians (age: 33.08 ± 11.57 years), 78 were non-brass band musicians (age: 35.39 ± 13.03 years), and 52 were non-musicians (age: 39.15 ± 8.73 years). The sight-over-sound effect was observed in non-brass band musicians (Kruskal-Wallis test: p < 0.001) but was absent in brass band musicians (p = 0.48) and non-musicians (p = 0.37). These findings indicate that the sight-over-sound effect depends on musical experience; specifically, our results indicate that auditory training in brass band musicians may mitigate the visual influence. Furthermore, the absence of the sight-over-sound effect in non-musicians suggests that without specific musical training, evaluators may not consistently prioritize visual information. The present findings fill a critical gap in our understanding of multisensory integration, especially regarding how different levels of musical expertise shape evaluative processes across sensory modalities. Our results underscore the need for educational and evaluative practices to consciously balance the influences of visual and auditory cues, particularly in situations in which visual dominance may overshadow auditory quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.