Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The role of photobiomodulation in the functional recovery of proximal humerus fractures: a randomized controlled clinical protocol.

Luiz Claudio de Freitas, Do Sung Kim, Daniel Santana da Costa, Henrique Pellacani Fernandes Soutello, Thiago Roncoletta Salata, Luis Fumio Sato, Nilton Iuichi Takahashi, Valenthin de Souza Gomes, Priscila Terumi Kondo, Gustavo Guedes Lomonaco and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luiz Claudio de FreitasPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Do Sung KimClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Santana da CostaClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Henrique Pellacani Fernandes SoutelloClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Roncoletta SalataClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis Fumio SatoClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nilton Iuichi TakahashiPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Valenthin de Souza GomesClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Priscila Terumi KondoClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Guedes LomonacoClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno Ricardo TrigoClínica de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Dr. Alípio Correa Netto (HMACN), Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cinthya Cosme Gutierrez DuranPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9055-1524
Sandra Kalil BussadoriPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Lara Jansiski MottaPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-FerrariPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini HorlianaPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Kristianne Porta Santos FernandesPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics-Medicine, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-9286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain and joint stiffness contribute to functional limitation in the postoperative period following proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Photobiomodulation (PBM) has demonstrated positive outcomes in fracture repair, analgesia, and functional improvement, as evidenced by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and experimental animal studies. Clinical studies have shown PBM's efficacy in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes, while preclinical studies have demonstrated enhanced bone regeneration through PBM application. This clinical study is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to investigate the effects of PBM on the shoulder functional recovery after proximal humerus fractures. A total of forty-two participants, aged 18-65 years of both genders, will be randomly divided into two groups: the Control group (receiving physiotherapy combined with simulated PBM) and the PBM group (receiving physiotherapy combined with active PBM). The PBM application (10 minutes) will be performed daily by the participants at home, using a device equipped with 318 light-emitting diodes (LEDs), consisting of 159 LEDs at 660 nm (28.5 mW; 12 J/cm²; 17 J per LED) and 159 LEDs at 850 nm (23 mW; 10 J/cm²; 14 J per LED). The PBM sessions, along with physiotherapy sessions (30 minutes, twice weekly), will be conducted over a 12-week period. Participants will be blinded to their group allocation and will be assessed by a single evaluator at 24 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks post-surgery. The evaluator will also be blinded to the participants' group assignments. The primary outcome will be shoulder functional recovery after proximal humerus fractures, assessed using the Quick-DASH scale at all experimental time points. Secondary outcomes will include range of motion (measured with a digital goniometer), quality of life (evaluated using the SF-6D questionnaire), pain on pressure and the incidence of adverse effects, all assessed at each time point. Spontaneous pain, nocturnal pain and analgesic use will be evaluated over a 12-week period. Fracture consolidation will be assessed through radiography at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Muscle strength will be measured through dumbbell lifting at weeks 8 and 12. If the data are normally distributed, ANOVA will be used, and results will be presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). If the data are not normally distributed, they will be presented as medians and interquartile ranges, with comparisons made using non-parametric tests. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyRecovery of FunctionShoulder FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40299985
PMCPMC12040229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.