Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299940›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Indoor fire and smoke detection based on optimized YOLOv5.

Md Shafak Shahriar Sozol, M Rubaiyat Hossain Mondal, Achmad Husni Thamrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Shafak Shahriar SozolInstitute of Information and Communication Technology, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
M Rubaiyat Hossain MondalInstitute of Information and Communication Technology, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8582-9197
Achmad Husni ThamrinKeio University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring safety and safeguarding indoor properties require reliable fire detection methods. Traditional detection techniques that use smoke, heat, or fire sensors often fail due to false positives and slow response time. Existing deep learning-based object detectors fall short of improved accuracy in indoor settings and real-time tracking, considering the dynamic nature of fire and smoke. This study aimed to address these challenges in fire and smoke detection in indoor settings. It presents a hyperparameter-optimized YOLOv5 (HPO-YOLOv5) model optimized by a genetic algorithm. To cover all prospective scenarios, we created a novel dataset comprising indoor fire and smoke images. There are 5,000 images in the dataset, split into training, validation, and testing samples at a ratio of 80:10:10. It also used the Grad-CAM technique to provide visual explanations for model predictions, ensuring interpretability and transparency. This research combined YOLOv5 with DeepSORT (which uses deep learning features to improve the tracking of objects over time) to provide real-time monitoring of fire progression. Thus, it allows for the notification of actual fire hazards. With a mean average precision (mAP@0.5) of 92.1%, the HPO-YOLOv5 model outperformed state-of-the-art models, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv5, YOLOv7 and YOLOv8. The proposed model achieved a 2.4% improvement in mAP@0.5 over the original YOLOv5 baseline model. The research has laid the foundation for future developments in fire hazard detection technology, a system that is dependable and effective in indoor scenarios.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringFiresSmokeAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansSmoke

Identifiers

PMID40299940
PMCPMC12040180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.