ArticlePloS one2025
Winners' strategies: Comprehensive analysis and optimization of 2-point shots in 3x3 basketball using multi-criteria decision support analysis, on the example of two Olympic National Teams.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study presents an innovative approach to analyzing and optimizing 2-point shooting strategies in 3x3 basketball, using newly defined parameters and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). A comparative analysis of the results of the Polish and Serbian national teams from the Olympic Games in Tokyo 2020 allowed us to identify key factors influencing the effectiveness of shots, such as the location of the shot, interaction with the defender, and the time of the action. It was shown that the Serbian team was more effective, which translated into a better result. Differences in shooting strategies were identified, especially in the crucial second half of the match, emphasizing the importance of tactical flexibility. Multi-criteria modeling showed that two factors - the effectiveness of shots and the average duration of an action - could be used to optimize game strategy. To leverage these findings, we emphasize the need for individualized training measures focused on generating shooting opportunities for oneself and teammates, which in turn increases decision-making effectiveness in key moments (e.g., when trailing in score). 3x3 basketball offers a unique opportunity to analyze strategies that rely more on cooperation, creativity, and improvisation than on the strictly defined tactical systems of 5x5. Research into this format can contribute to a deeper understanding of decision-making processes, shooting efficiency, and adaptive responses of players in high-intensity situations, which may also apply to other fast-paced team sports. This study proposes to continue the research with larger numbers of teams to develop new models for a more detailed understanding of shooting efficiency in this discipline, including the influence of fatigue, tactical adjustments, and partial automation of measurements. These further studies will fill existing research gaps and positively impact the development of this new Olympic discipline. This is one of the first studies to apply multi-criteria decision analysis to 3x3 basketball tactics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.