Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299885›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2025

A deep-learning algorithm using real-time collected intraoperative vital sign signals for predicting acute kidney injury after major non-cardiac surgeries: A modelling study.

Sehoon Park, Soomin Chung, Yisak Kim, Sun-Ah Yang, Soie Kwon, Jeong Min Cho, Min Jae Lee, Eunbyeol Cho, Jiwon Ryu, Sejoong Kim and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Dynamic Online Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sehoon ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-2453
Soomin ChungInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Yisak KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Sun-Ah YangDepartment of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-5396
Soie KwonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-5469
Jeong Min ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Min Jae LeeKAIST: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2429-1568
Eunbyeol ChoKAIST: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7848-2642
Jiwon RyuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Sejoong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Jeonghwan LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-635X
Hyung Jin YoonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-4894
Edward ChoiKAIST: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-3509
Kwangsoo KimDepartment of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hajeong LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-1587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) prediction models for non-cardiac major surgeries typically rely solely on preoperative clinical characteristics. METHODS AND

findingsIn this study, we developed and externally validated a deep-learning-based model that integrates preoperative data with minute-scale intraoperative vital signs to predict PO-AKI. Using data from three hospitals, we constructed a convolutional neural network-based EfficientNet framework to analyze intraoperative data and created an ensemble model incorporating 103 baseline variables of demographics, medication use, comorbidities, and surgery-related characteristics. Model performance was compared with the conventional SPARK model from a previous study. Among 110,696 patients, 51,345 were included in the development cohort, and 59,351 in the external validation cohorts. The median age of the cohorts was 60, 61, and 66 years, respectively, with males comprising 54.9%, 50.8%, and 42.7% of each cohort. The intraoperative vital sign-based model demonstrated comparable predictive power (AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve): discovery cohort 0.707, validation cohort 0.637 and 0.607) to preoperative-only models (AUROC: discovery cohort 0.724, validation cohort 0.697 and 0.745). Adding 11 key clinical variables (e.g., age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, hyponatremia, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, diabetes, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, emergency surgery, and the estimated surgery time) improved the model's performance (AUROC: discovery cohort 0.765, validation cohort 0.716 and 0.761). The ensembled deep-learning model integrating both preoperative and intraoperative data achieved the highest predictive accuracy (AUROC: discovery cohort 0.795, validation cohort 0.762 and 0.786), outperforming the conventional SPARK model. The retrospective design in a single-nation cohort with non-inclusion of some potential AKI-associated variables is the main limitation of this study.

conclusionsThis deep-learning-based PO-AKI risk prediction model provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating PO-AKI risk prediction by combining preoperative clinical data with real-time intraoperative vital sign information, offering enhanced predictive performance for better clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAlgorithmsDeep LearningPostoperative ComplicationsVital SignsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40299885
PMCPMC12040160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.