Observational studyPLoS medicine2025
A deep-learning algorithm using real-time collected intraoperative vital sign signals for predicting acute kidney injury after major non-cardiac surgeries: A modelling study.
Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Identification of acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery by machine learning leveraging a large electronic health record database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Acute kidney injury prediction and prognostication using machine learning.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Which Method Best Predicts Postoperative Complications: Deep Learning, Machine Learning, or Conventional Logistic Regression?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- A Dynamic Online Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Forecasting ICU Acute Kidney Injury with Actionable Lead Time Using Interpretable Machine Learning: Development and Multi-Center Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) prediction models for non-cardiac major surgeries typically rely solely on preoperative clinical characteristics. METHODS AND
findingsIn this study, we developed and externally validated a deep-learning-based model that integrates preoperative data with minute-scale intraoperative vital signs to predict PO-AKI. Using data from three hospitals, we constructed a convolutional neural network-based EfficientNet framework to analyze intraoperative data and created an ensemble model incorporating 103 baseline variables of demographics, medication use, comorbidities, and surgery-related characteristics. Model performance was compared with the conventional SPARK model from a previous study. Among 110,696 patients, 51,345 were included in the development cohort, and 59,351 in the external validation cohorts. The median age of the cohorts was 60, 61, and 66 years, respectively, with males comprising 54.9%, 50.8%, and 42.7% of each cohort. The intraoperative vital sign-based model demonstrated comparable predictive power (AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve): discovery cohort 0.707, validation cohort 0.637 and 0.607) to preoperative-only models (AUROC: discovery cohort 0.724, validation cohort 0.697 and 0.745). Adding 11 key clinical variables (e.g., age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, hyponatremia, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, diabetes, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, emergency surgery, and the estimated surgery time) improved the model's performance (AUROC: discovery cohort 0.765, validation cohort 0.716 and 0.761). The ensembled deep-learning model integrating both preoperative and intraoperative data achieved the highest predictive accuracy (AUROC: discovery cohort 0.795, validation cohort 0.762 and 0.786), outperforming the conventional SPARK model. The retrospective design in a single-nation cohort with non-inclusion of some potential AKI-associated variables is the main limitation of this study.
conclusionsThis deep-learning-based PO-AKI risk prediction model provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating PO-AKI risk prediction by combining preoperative clinical data with real-time intraoperative vital sign information, offering enhanced predictive performance for better clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.