ArticlePloS one2025
Analysis of crop disease and pest occurrences: Insights from Japan's national surveys.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of crop diseases and pests (CDPs) is crucial for ensuring food security. In Japan, nationwide CDP field surveys have been conducted for over half a century at an annual cost of approximately 300 million JPY, with the primary goals of predicting CDP outbreaks and estimating within-year damages. Despite the magnitude of these efforts, the collected data remain underutilized. Therefore, this study aimed to contribute to the advancement of this field by evaluating the potential of leveraging historical Japanese CDP survey data to forecast CDP occurrences. Through comprehensive analysis and statistical modeling, we found that a simple algorithm-averaging data from the past five years without incorporating seasonal trends or meteorological variables-outperformed more complex models, underscoring the value of historical CDP survey data. However, the prediction error remained substantial, with an RMSE of 6.2 ± 19.6. Notably, as 70.1% of the CDP survey data recorded values of five or less, an error of 6.2 indicates poor predictive accuracy in most cases. Given the challenges of precise forecasting, the high cost of nationwide surveys, and Japan's lowest self-sufficiency rate, fundamental reforms are needed. Integrating modern technologies, including IoT/ICT and artificial intelligence, could enhance the sustainability of CDP survey, ultimately safeguarding food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.