Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299879›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Analysis of crop disease and pest occurrences: Insights from Japan's national surveys.

Jianqiang Sun, Sunao Ochi, Takehiko Yamanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianqiang SunResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-3199
Sunao OchiInstitute for Plant Protection, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takehiko YamanakaResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of crop diseases and pests (CDPs) is crucial for ensuring food security. In Japan, nationwide CDP field surveys have been conducted for over half a century at an annual cost of approximately 300 million JPY, with the primary goals of predicting CDP outbreaks and estimating within-year damages. Despite the magnitude of these efforts, the collected data remain underutilized. Therefore, this study aimed to contribute to the advancement of this field by evaluating the potential of leveraging historical Japanese CDP survey data to forecast CDP occurrences. Through comprehensive analysis and statistical modeling, we found that a simple algorithm-averaging data from the past five years without incorporating seasonal trends or meteorological variables-outperformed more complex models, underscoring the value of historical CDP survey data. However, the prediction error remained substantial, with an RMSE of 6.2 ± 19.6. Notably, as 70.1% of the CDP survey data recorded values of five or less, an error of 6.2 indicates poor predictive accuracy in most cases. Given the challenges of precise forecasting, the high cost of nationwide surveys, and Japan's lowest self-sufficiency rate, fundamental reforms are needed. Integrating modern technologies, including IoT/ICT and artificial intelligence, could enhance the sustainability of CDP survey, ultimately safeguarding food security.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPlant DiseasesAlgorithmsFood SecurityForecastingHumansJapanModels, StatisticalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40299879
PMCPMC12040168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.