Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299873›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Standardized methods for rearing a moth larva, Manduca sexta, in a laboratory setting.

Emma K Spencer, Craig R Miller, James J Bull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma K SpencerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9982-8152
Craig R MillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
James J BullDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.

Funding

Sequence-structure-function relationships in human visual photopigmentsP20GM104420 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI VAN LEUVEN, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$22.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The larval tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, has been used in a laboratory setting for physiological studies and for pathogen virulence studies. This moth offers a much larger size than the commonly used wax moth (Galleria mellonella), and it can thus be used for a greater variety of assays, such as repeated sampling of the same individual, growth measurements, and tissue sampling. Yet their occasional use in research has led to a minimally documented set of rearing methods. To facilitate further adoption of this insect model, we expanded on previously reported protocols and developed our own rearing methods, which we report here. Our protocol requires little specialized equipment, with a cost less than $100/month for the feeding and maintenance of a laboratory colony of about five hundred larvae of differing instar phases. The low cost generalized equipment and supplies, and the simplification of the standardized protocols allows for an easy entry point for rearing tobacco hornworm populations. We also describe a few methods that are relevant to the uses of these organisms as infection models.

Indexed as

ManducaAnimalsLarva

Identifiers

PMID40299873
PMCPMC12040098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.