ArticlePloS one2025
Investigation into fatigue micro-crack identification of steel bridge decks based on acoustic emission detection technology.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing traffic loads and extended bridge service life, fatigue damage in steel bridge decks has become a significant concern. Traditional detection methods often lack the accuracy and responsiveness needed for practical engineering applications. To address the non-stationary nature of acoustic emission (AE) signals during crack initiation and propagation, this study combines the K-singular value decomposition (K-SVD) dictionary learning algorithm with convolutional neural networks (CNN) to enhance AE signal processing and fatigue crack detection. The K-SVD algorithm functions as an adaptive filter, learning from AE signals in various damage states to remove background noise and retain critical structural characteristics. This processed AE data is then input into a CNN, where the improved signal clarity enables higher classification accuracy. Specifically, the integration of K-SVD with CNN achieved recognition accuracies of 93.64% and 92.56% for AE signals from damaged areas, and 95.32% and 94.27% for undamaged signals, on training and test sets, respectively. This approach demonstrates strong engineering potential by providing a scalable solution for real-time, accurate crack detection in bridge inspections. Though computationally intensive, K-SVD's adaptive dictionary learning enhances CNN performance, making the combination viable with optimization strategies in practical settings. These results provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for improving fatigue crack detection in steel bridge decks, supporting future applications in automated bridge inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.