ArticlePloS one2025
Simplifying drone-based aboveground carbon density measurements to support community forestry.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based forest restoration has the potential to sequester large amounts of atmospheric carbon, avoid forest degradation, and support sustainable development. However, if partnered with international funders, such projects often require robust and transparent aboveground carbon measurements to secure payments, and current monitoring approaches are not necessarily appropriate due to costs, scale, and complexity. The use of consumer-grade drones in combination with open source structure-from-motion photogrammetry may provide a solution. In this study, we tested the suitability of a simplified drone-based method for measuring aboveground carbon density in heavily degraded tropical forests at a 2 ha restoration site in Sabah, Malaysia, comparing our results against established field-based methods. We used structure-from-motion photogrammetry to generate canopy height models from drone imagery, and applied multiple pre-published plot-aggregate allometric equations to examine the importance of utilising regionally calibrated allometric equations. Our results suggest that this simplified method can produce aboveground carbon density measurements of a similar magnitude to field-based methods, quickly and only with a single input metric. However, there are greater levels of uncertainty in carbon density measurements due to errors associated with canopy height measurements from drones. Our findings also highlight the importance of selecting regionally calibrated allometric equations for this approach. At scales between 1 and 100 ha, drone-based methods provide an appealing option for data acquisition and carbon measurement, balancing trade-offs between accuracy, simplicity, and cost effectiveness and coinciding well with the needs of community-scale aboveground carbon measurement. Of importance, we also discuss considerations relating to the accessibility of this method for community use, beyond purchasing a drone, that must not be overlooked. Nevertheless, the method presented here lays the foundations for a simple workflow for measuring aboveground carbon density at a community scale that can be refined in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.