ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring joint decision-making and family dynamics to identify barriers and enablers for early adolescent medical circumcision (EAMC) uptake in Zambia for HIV prevention: An innovative methodology.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) to protect against sexual transmission of HIV is a key part of HIV prevention interventions in 15 priority countries in Southern and Eastern Africa. Ensuring that VMMC programs reach adolescent males is important in countries with large young populations. We designed a methodology to explore the joint decision-making dynamics among caregivers and adolescents aged 10-19, and the drivers and barriers for circumcision, in order to identify levers which can drive uptake of VMMC. Our approach was grounded in behavioral science to address some of the limitations of survey-based research (e.g., the "say-do gap," social desirability bias, respondent fatigue). Our methods included 1) interviews with adolescent boys and their caregivers to understand how adolescents interact with their families, other key stakeholders, and the healthcare system; 2) journey mapping to understand how boys and caregivers move through the stages of progress toward the decision for VMMC, and the influence of context, family, and community members; and 3) Ethnolab, a decision-making game that tests behavioral hypotheses in hypothetical situations mimicking the real-life context of decision-making about VMMC, enabling an understanding of boys' and caregiver's motivators, barriers, and mental models via observation as well as questioning. Factors influencing the decision for VMMC included anticipated pain of the surgical procedure, mistrust about safety, the boy's uncertainty about his caregiver's consent, and caregiver's uncertainty about the adolescent's assent, and caregiver's concern about their adolescent boy's maturity level and ability to deal with VMMC, among others. Conversely, in-group seeking, the belief that being circumcised is appreciated by women, and improved hygiene were among the positive factors motivating decisions for VMMC. Demand generation should involve the whole family unit, encouraging discussion and trust within and among households, and recognizing and addressing the ways decision dynamics change as the boy ages through adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.