ArticlePloS one2025
Implementation of a smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental illness in ambulatory mental healthcare (KISMET): A process evaluation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a one-year smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental illness: results of the KISMET cluster-randomized controlled trial.Psychological medicine · 2026Trial
- Clearing the smoke: experiences of patients and professionals during a one-year smoking cessation intervention in ambulatory mental healthcare - a qualitative study.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of a group nursing intervention in reducing anxiety and depression for smoking cessation: a quasi-experimental study in light of Afaf Meleis' Transition Theory.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, a cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted within Dutch ambulatory mental healthcare to assess the effectiveness of a one-year smoking cessation intervention consisting of group sessions, peer support and pharmacological treatment (KISMET). This article presents its process evaluation, exploring the perceptions of patients and mental healthcare professionals (MHPs) regarding the implementation of KISMET.
methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study, including 26 semi-structured interviews (10 MHPs and 16 patients) following the RE-AIM framework. Qualitative data was thematically analysed with MAXQDA software. We collected additional data on inclusion, drop-out and assessed treatment adherence during on-site observations.
resultsRecruitment and subsequent retention of patients in the RCT was found to be challenging (58% drop-out at one-year follow-up). MHPs suggested more motivational enhancement techniques to aid recruitment and reduce study attrition. The intervention components were generally assessed positively. Patients experienced the group and peer support sessions as supportive and beneficial. Inconsistent group attendance was demotivating and disrupted implementation. Pharmacological treatment was found to be helpful, although MHPs mentioned the treating psychiatrist or clinical nurse specialist need to facilitate better to ensure medication supply. The handbook offered MHPs excellent guidance and significantly contributed to treatment fidelity. Surprisingly, the carbon monoxide monitoring (originally included in the study protocol for research purposes) was appraised as a motivational tool. Finally, shortage of staff, limited collaboration and high turnover were barriers for the delivery of the intervention. Implementation heavily depends on the quality of the collaboration between MHPs and patients, as well as the infrastructure created by the organisation.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the benefits, unique demands and challenges of a smoking cessation intervention for people with SMI. Results could guide and improve the implementation of smoking cessation interventions in mental healthcare settings. Fostering a culture of connectivity through team development, along with the provision of supportive and communicative supervision is critical for the effective recruitment and retention in smoking cessation studies in psychiatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.