Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299828›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Sevenfold Underestimation of Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells in Canada.

Louise A Klotz, Liam Woolley, Bianca Lamarche, Jade Boutot, Mary Kang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louise A KlotzDepartment of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.
Liam WoolleyDepartment of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-3986-1471
Bianca LamarcheDepartment of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.
Jade BoutotDepartment of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3445-5009
Mary KangDepartment of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9142-384X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of non-producing oil and gas wells around the world are leaking methane and other contaminants, contributing to increased greenhouse gas emissions and polluting our water, soil, and air. Quantifying methane emissions and understanding the attributes driving these emissions are important for evaluating the scale of the environmental risks and informing mitigation strategies. With our national-scale direct measurement database of 494 non-producing wells across Canada, we find total annual methane emissions from non-producing wells in Canada to be 230 kt/year (51-560 kt/year) for 2023, which is 7 (1.5-16) times higher than estimated in Canada's National Inventory Report (34 kt/year) and accounts for 13% of total fugitive emissions from oil and natural gas systems in Canada. We show that the role of well attributes in methane emissions is best evaluated by considering the emitting component (wellhead/surface casing vent) and the spatial scale (e.g., national, provincial, subprovincial). Large uncertainties in methane emissions from non-producing wells can be reduced not only with additional measurements but also with detailed well attribute analysis using direct measurements. Identifying attributes linked to high emitters can also be used to prioritize mitigation, thereby reducing methane emissions and broader environmental risks.

Indexed as

MethaneOil and Gas FieldsCanadaEnvironmental MonitoringGreenhouse GasesNatural GasPetroleumGreenhouse GasesMethaneNatural GasPetroleumabandonedleakagemethane emissionsoil and gas wellswell attributes

Identifiers

PMID40299828
PMCPMC12080243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.