ArticlePloS one2025
A study on information perception and engagement, emphasizing the essential role of E-clinics among Palestinian adolescents.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents increasingly rely on electronic platforms for health information, highlighting their rapid technological adoption among significant developmental changes. Utilizing E-clinics presents a promising approach to enhance their health outcomes. This study aimed to identify adolescents' preferred health information sources, the challenges guiding their choices, and assess their willingness to use E-clinics. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adolescents in grades 8-12 in governmental schools across the West Bank, Palestine. 646 questionnaires were distributed (69.5% females, 30.5% males; median age 16). Results highlighted family/friends (34.4%), HCPs (32.5%), and the Internet (23.7%) as primary sources of health information, with 91.2% of Internet users seeking health advice. Internet convenience (56.2%), abundant information (31.9%), and anonymity (7.6%) were valued by participants. Place of residence significantly (p < 0.001) influenced health information sources, with 94.4% in the center preferring the Internet. Three key factors emerged: trust in HCPs (p < 0.001) influenced reliance on them (76.7%), and willingness to use E-clinics for privacy (63.5%); distrust in healthcare services led to Internet reliance (32.7%) and E-clinic interest for privacy (30.4%); privacy concerns (p = 0.00) led unconcerned participants (52.9%) to rely on the Internet, and 51.6% believed E-clinics were private. Trust in HCPs and healthcare services influenced E-clinic anonymity perception, while location and privacy concerns affected E-clinic benefits perception. Findings suggest that E-clinics can improve accessibility to healthcare by filling the gaps left by traditional healthcare models while also addressing privacy issues. Incorporating them in healthcare systems that serve adolescents can improve trust, accessibility, and improve well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.