Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299649›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Corneal Neurotization, Recent Progress, and Future Perspectives.

Ovidiu Samoilă, Lăcrămioara Samoilă, Lorina Petrescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurotrophic keratopathy patients after minimally invasive corneal neurotization treated with RhNGF eyedrops: a case series.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ovidiu SamoilăOphthalmology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-0512
Lăcrămioara SamoilăPhysiology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Lorina PetrescuVedis Ophthalmology Clinic, 400371 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a rare degenerative disease caused by impairment of the trigeminal nerve, leading to corneal anesthesia, epithelial breakdown, and progressive vision loss. Conventional treatments primarily focus on symptom management and the prevention of complications, but they do not address the underlying nerve dysfunction. Corneal neurotization (NT) has emerged as a promising surgical intervention aimed at restoring corneal sensation and improving ocular surface homeostasis. This review evaluates the outcomes of corneal neurotization in patients with NK and compares the effectiveness of direct (DNT) and indirect (INT) techniques. Studies have reported significant improvements in corneal sensitivity, with success rates ranging from 60.7% to 100% (mean: 90%). Most patients experienced recovery of corneal sensation, as measured by the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer, with no significant differences in outcomes between DNT and INT. Indirect neurotization using a sural nerve graft was the most commonly employed technique (63% of cases), while the use of acellular allografts demonstrated comparable efficacy and simplified the procedure. Postoperative corneal sensitivity increased significantly, from a preoperative average of 2.717 mm to 36.01 mm, with reinnervation typically occurring within 4-6 months and peaking at 12 months. In vivo confocal microscopy confirmed the presence of nerve regeneration. Neurotization was found to be safe, with minimal donor-site complications, which generally resolved within one year. Although the procedure improves corneal sensation and tear film stability, visual acuity outcomes remain variable due to pre-existing corneal damage. Early intervention is, therefore, recommended to prevent irreversible scarring. However, the number of patients undergoing the procedure remains limited, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Most available studies consist of small case series. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to refine surgical techniques and optimize patient selection, thereby improving outcomes in the management of NK.

Indexed as

corneal neurotizationcorneal ulcerneurotrophic keratopathyreinnervation

Identifiers

PMID40299649
PMCPMC12024739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.