Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299386›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Long-Term Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Laser Tonsillotomy vs Tonsillectomy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Justin Emile Raoul Edouard Wong Chung, Wilbert Bernhard van den Hout, Noud van Helmond, Peter Paul Germain van Benthem, Hendrikus Maria Blom

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin Emile Raoul Edouard Wong ChungDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Wilbert Bernhard van den HoutDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Noud van HelmondDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cooper University Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey.
Peter Paul Germain van BenthemDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hendrikus Maria BlomDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The current treatment for adult tonsil disease, tonsillectomy (TE), may involve a burdensome recovery. Objective: To evaluate long-term efficacy (1- and 2-year efficacy) and cost-effectiveness of carbon dioxide (CO2) laser tonsillotomy (TO) vs TE. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial was conducted in 5 Dutch hospitals. Participants included adults with persistent tonsil-related symptoms enrolled from January 25, 2018, to December 17, 2019. Data analysis was performed from January 5, 2025, to April 9, 2025. Interventions: Tonsillectomy under general anesthesia vs CO2 laser TO under local anesthesia. Main Outcomes and Measures: Intention-to-treat analysis on primary (persistent symptoms, defined as an answer of yes to the question of whether symptoms were still present, reported at 1 and 2 years) and secondary (symptom severity, patient satisfaction, quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs], and cost-effectiveness) outcomes. Results: In total, 98 patients were assigned to TO and 101 to TE; 98 were analyzed per group. The TO and TE groups were similar (69 [70%] vs 67 [68%] female; mean [SD] age, 29 [10] vs 30 [8] years). The most common symptom was sore throat with fever (34% vs 34%), with a baseline mean (SD) severity score of 57 (19) vs 59 (17) mm. At 1 year, 51.8% of patients assigned to TO had persistent symptoms vs 25.2% assigned to TE (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.4; P < .001); at 2 years, 45.2% vs 19.7% had persistent symptoms (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-6.7; P < .001). Symptom severity decreased significantly in both groups but was lower after TE at 1 year (14.8 vs 23.0 mm; mean difference, -8.1 mm; 95% CI, -14.8 to -1.5 mm; P = .02) and 2 years (10.8 vs 19.6 mm; mean difference, -8.8 mm; 95% CI, -14.7 to -2.9 mm; P = .001). Patient satisfaction was similar between groups; mean VAS scores were 79.0 (95% CI, 72.2-85.9) mm for TE and 69.3 (95% CI, 63.4-75.3) mm for TO at 1 year and 64.1 (95% CI, 55.7-72.5) mm and 64.4 (95% CI, 56.9-71.8) mm at 2 years. Similar proportions of participants would recommend the procedure at 1 year (79% TE vs 76% TO) and 2 years (71%, both). Both TE and TO demonstrated high cumulative QALYs at 2 years (EuroQol 5 Dimension: mean, 1.89 vs 1.84; mean difference, 0.05, P = .06; EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale: mean, 1.83 vs 1.81, mean difference, 0.02; P = .38). Tonsillotomy had lower overall costs ($869 vs $2363 for TE), with societal cost savings of $1925 (P = .001), and a 71% probability of cost-effectiveness at $25 907 per QALY (85%-93% in sensitivity analyses). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial suggest that both CO2 laser TO and TE under general anesthesia significantly reduced long-term symptoms, with greater reduction after TE. TO had lower cost and similar patient satisfaction. Based on these findings, CO2-laser TO appears to be a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for long-term relief of tonsil-related problems with excellent patient satisfaction. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NL 6866.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyTonsillectomyTonsillitisAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLasers, GasMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient SatisfactionQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40299386
PMCPMC12042055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.