ArticleJAMA network open2025
AI-Enabled Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity in Low-Resource Settings.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthcare analytics perspectives on artificial intelligence-based retinopathy of prematurity screening: a bibliometric mapping study.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of community-based artificial intelligence screening for retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using machine learning models.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric myopia - a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Clinical Performance and Implementation of AI-Enabled Paediatric Ophthalmic Screening, Triage, Diagnosis, and Surveillance in Primary, Community, and Referral-Linked Pathways: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smartphone-based lightweight AI system for real-time multiple anterior segment disease screening: development and real-world validation.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- External validation and updating of DIGIROP prediction models including parenteral nutrition for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity in a Swedish national cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The social and economic burden of retinopathy of prematurity: screening, treatment, and health policy perspectives in a transnational narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Validation of a screening score model to predict the development of retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neonatal retinal hemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity: a critical review of current practices and future directions.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of preventable childhood blindness worldwide. If detected and treated early, ROP-associated blindness is preventable; however, identifying patients who might respond to treatment requires screening over time, which is challenging in low-resource settings where access to pediatric ophthalmologists and pediatric ocular imaging cameras is limited. Objective: To develop and assess the performance of a machine learning algorithm that uses smartphone-collected videos to perform retinal screening for ROP in low-resource settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used smartphone-obtained videos of fundi in premature neonates with and without ROP in Mexico and Argentina between May 12, 2020, and October 31, 2023. Machine-learning (ML)-driven algorithms were developed to process a video, identify the best frames within the video, and use those frames to determine whether ROP was likely or not. Eligible neonates born with gestational age less than 36 weeks or birth weight less than 1500 g were included on the study. Exposures: An ML algorithm applied to a smartphone-obtained video. Main Outcomes and Measures: The ML algorithms' ability to identify high-quality retinal images and classify those images as indicating ROP or not at the frame and patient levels, measured by accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity, compared with classifications from 3 pediatric ophthalmologists. Results: A total of 524 videos were collected for 512 neonates with median gestational age of 32 weeks (range, 25-36 weeks) and median birth weight of 1610 g (range, 580-2800 g). The frame selection model identified high-quality retinal images from 397 of 456 videos (87.1%; 95% CI, 84.0%-90.1%) reserved for testing model performance. Across all test videos, 97.4% (95% CI, 96.7%-98.1%) of high-quality retinal images selected by the model contained fundus images. At the frame level, the ROP classifier model had a sensitivity of 76.7% (95% CI, 69.9%-83.5%); at the patient level, the classifier model had a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI, 86.4%-100%). At both levels, the model's sensitivity was higher than that for the panel of pediatric ophthalmologists (frame level: 71.4% [95% CI, 64.1%-78.7%]; patient level: 73.3% [95% CI, 61.0%-85.6%]). Specificity and accuracy were higher for ophthalmologist classification vs the ML model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, a process that used smartphone-collected videos of premature neonates' fundi to determine whether high-quality retinal images were present had high sensitivity to classify such images as indicating or not indicating ROP but lower specificity and accuracy than ophthalmologist assessment. This process costs a fraction of the current process for retinal image collection and classification and could be used to expand access to ROP screening in low-resource settings, with potential to help prevent the most common cause of preventable childhood blindness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.