Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299380›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Menstrual Cycle Length Changes Following Vaccination Against Influenza Alone or With COVID-19.

Emily R Boniface, Blair G Darney, Agathe van Lamsweerde, Eleonora Benhar, Alexandra Alvergne, Alison Edelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily R BonifaceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Blair G DarneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Agathe van LamsweerdeNatural Cycles Nordic AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eleonora BenharNatural Cycles Nordic AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexandra AlvergneInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Montpellier University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Alison EdelmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Funding

Improving emergency contraceptive effectiveness in obese womenR01HD089957 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, ALISON B · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Multiple studies have identified an association between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual disturbances. Data on whether menstrual health is impacted by other vaccines are needed to counsel individuals about what to expect and to address vaccine hesitancy. Objective: To assess the association of changes in length of the menstrual cycle with influenza vaccination, with or without concurrent receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants: This global retrospective cohort study prospectively collected menstrual cycle data from April 25, 2023, to February 27, 2024 (4-5 cycles per individual), among international English-speaking users of a digital birth control application. Participants included individuals aged 18 to 45 years, not using hormonal contraception, and with average cycle lengths of 24 to 38 days in 3 consecutive cycles before receipt of vaccines. Exposure: Seasonal influenza vaccination with or without concurrent receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome consisted of adjusted mean within-individual changes of menstrual cycle length assessed by vaccination group. Secondary analysis evaluated the phase of menstrual cycle at time of vaccination. Results: A total of 1501 individuals met the inclusion criteria, of whom 791 were vaccinated for influenza only and 710 were concurrently vaccinated for influenza and COVID-19. By race and ethnicity, 1 participant (0.1%) was American Indian or Alaska Native; 10 (0.7%), Asian; 3 (0.2%), Black; 15 (1.0%), Hispanic or Latina; 1 (0.1%), Middle Eastern or North African; 368 (24.5%), White; and 19 (1.3%), other; and 1084 (72.2%), missing. Most of the cohort was younger than 35 years (1230 [82.0%]), had at least a college degree (1122 [74.8%]), and was located in the US or Canada (938 [62.5%]). Individuals vaccinated for influenza alone experienced an adjusted mean increase of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.08-0.72) days, while those vaccinated concurrently for influenza and COVID-19 experienced a mean increase of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.16-0.83) days (P = .69 for difference between vaccine groups). A total of 37 individuals (4.7%) experienced a change in cycle length of at least 8 days with influenza vaccine only and 42 (5.9%) with concurrent receipt of both vaccines (P = .28). In the postvaccination cycle, both vaccination groups returned to their prevaccination cycle lengths. Menstrual cycle changes occurred with vaccination in the follicular phase but not the luteal phase. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals with regular menstrual cycles, influenza vaccine given alone or in combination with a COVID-19 vaccine was associated with a small but temporary change in menstrual cycle length. These findings may help clinicians confirm the utility of vaccination for patients with concerns about menstrual adverse effects of vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMenstrual CycleVaccinationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40299380
PMCPMC12042056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.