ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Evaluating a Clinical Chaplain Pilot Intervention to Facilitate Advance Care Planning in a Primary Care Clinic.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile advance care planning (ACP) conversations align an individual's healthcare options to their goals, primary care physicians (PCPs) often have limited time and training to conduct ACP in clinic. A clinical chaplain's unique expertise may provide targeted support to help overcome these barriers by assessing the complex dynamics around ACP for patients and providers alike.
objectivesAssess the feasibility and impact of a chaplain pilot intervention to facilitate ACP between PCPs and patients.
designThis pilot quality improvement study was conducted at an urban academic primary care clinic in the Southeastern United States.
participantsTwo hundred and six patients at high risk of hospitalization, determined by an institutional algorithm, were assigned to either intervention or control groups.
interventionFor each intervention patient, the chaplain reviewed their chart through a pastoral "empathetic, holistic, and relational framework" to (1) determine patient-specific ACP needs and barriers, and (2) complete targeted next steps to facilitate ACP with the PCP. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes were measured using the RE-AIM framework. ACP documentation metrics were compared between study arms before and 6 months after intervention. KEY
resultsThe chaplain determined that 75 out of 92 (82%) intervention patients needed additional ACP conversations. Average chart review time was 10 min (range 5-25). The chaplain contacted 62 PCPs and 11 patients, requested 26 appointments, and coordinated 19 interdisciplinary consultations. Compared to controls, intervention patients had a significant increase in ACP notes (35 vs. 2, p = < 0.001), healthcare power of attorney forms (9 vs. 2, p = 0.02), and advance directive forms (6 vs. 0, p = 0.01) after the intervention.
conclusionsA clinical chaplain's unique training and experience may provide feasible and worthwhile support to help identify patient-specific needs and barriers and facilitate ACP conversations between PCPs and high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.